I have an uncertainty that's been floating around in my mind.
Well, i know that we follow our heavier correctional polish with a Light polish to remove haze, eliminate minor defects and restore gloss but which of these 3 reasons is the main purpose?
Say for example I am using SSR 2.5 & I will follow up by FPII...
So do I use FPII only when the SSR2.5 (or whatever higher abrasive polish) has eliminated *all* swirls and defects?
I mean, is the *main function* of a Light polish eg. FPII, meant to be used when the defects have been removed and the paint is *Fully* corrected only to improve gloss or are we more so, to use a light polish for actual scratch removal??
:work: :nixweiss
Well, i know that we follow our heavier correctional polish with a Light polish to remove haze, eliminate minor defects and restore gloss but which of these 3 reasons is the main purpose?
Say for example I am using SSR 2.5 & I will follow up by FPII...
So do I use FPII only when the SSR2.5 (or whatever higher abrasive polish) has eliminated *all* swirls and defects?
I mean, is the *main function* of a Light polish eg. FPII, meant to be used when the defects have been removed and the paint is *Fully* corrected only to improve gloss or are we more so, to use a light polish for actual scratch removal??
:work: :nixweiss