Review...Aquapel vs Gtechniq G1

Mobilejay

Active member
Last year i had my windshield replaced due to a nice rock from the freeway. This was in October 2011. When the new windshield was installed, 2 weeks later I applied Aquapel on the driver side, and G1 from Gtechniq on the passenger side. I have a few videos showing how the water reacts during driving in the rain. Some of the vids may be a little hard to see the rain in or how it is working, I will explain my findings as well with the videos. I wash the vehicle every week, very rarely do I have to go 2 weeks before a wash but has happened a few times since October. I wash with 1Z Perls, and Wolf's Chemicals Nano Shampoo since I just applied Hard Body to my car this past month. I know people will say that the Perls and the Nano Shampoo may have messed with the coating, either by hindering the performance or helping but thats what I used. When the windshield was installed, I cleaned the windshield for the Gtechniq side per instructions. I used G4 to polish the window, afterwards I cleaned that with G2 (their IPA). I made sure the glass was very clean before the G1, I used the G2 to remove the first application and the 2nd application of G1 as well.



On the Aquapel side, I made sure to clean the window very thoroughly using IPA. The instructions don't say to use IPA but I figured since I used it for G1, I would use it for Aquapel. I then cracked the stick and applied to the windshield, up and down and left to right. Removed right after per the instructions.





Okay, this is the first video of the day I applied the coatings onto the windshield October 21st 2011. Left side (on the video, passenger side) is Gtechniq G1. Right side (on the video, driver side) is Aquapel.

G1 says to apply 2-3 coatings, if i'm not mistaken I applied 2. Aquapel just says to use 1 stick per windshield.





This was taken on the 27th of October while driving between 55-65mph on a freeway. The water can be a little hard to see in the video, but both sides seemed to be equal. Both sides were sheeting the water off the windshield very well.





This is on December 15th, you can see my speed on my speedometer, between 40-50ish mph. Both sides were still doing very well, almost impossible to tell a difference.





I am having trouble downloading the other two videos I have. They are up until March of this year I believe, If I can get them uploaded I all edit the post with them.





Both coatings performed very well. It has been 10 months that the coatings have been on the windshield. I drive it for work and my daily driver. I put between 45-70+ miles a day from Monday-Friday just for work. I am on the freeways 90% of the time getting hit with all the crap coming off the roads and the wheels off 18 wheelers.



I did begin to notice that the Aquapel was doing just a tiny bit better throwing the water off while driving at 50+mph. This wasn't until about May or June that I began to notice this. There was never a huge difference between the two sides through the 10 months that the applications has been on the windshield. Last week (on Aug. 23rd) it rained while I was driving. The coatings had a huge drop off in performance at the same time. Both sides were slowly sheeting the water off and there was more "standing" water towards the bottom/middle side of the Gtechniq side.



Aquapel says their application lasts 6 moths, while Gtechniq says a year I think. Someone chime in if I'm wrong with that. From my experience you can't go wrong with either, they are both great products. Neither side had any streaking with the wipers, if I did use them, clarity was always great, sheeting while driving was great, water running off the windshield while stopped was great. I did notice that the water would sheet off quicker at lower speeds with Aquapel, but not by a huge bit.

My personal opinion is that I will use Aquapel from now on just because it is cheaper and easier/quicker to apply. This is just me, Gtechniq has some great products out there but Aquapel makes more sense to me. I will say that I have used Aquapel before, but not with doing an IPA cleaning before the applications. I think that really helps the durability and sticking to the glass. Now, I have had Aquapel on my side windows and the back window for about 2 years now and it still throws water off like crazy.

I was not told by either company to perform any testing, this was just for me and to help others out with questions between the two. When I was looking around a year or two ago, there were a lot of people wondering which was better, so this is just my findings. Take it how you will. About the other videos, I will try to post them if I can get them to work. Hope you enjoyed the test.
 
"I made sure the glass was very clean before the G1, I used the G2 to remove the first application and the 2nd application of G1 as well."





Instructions calls for 3 coats on the front screen, not 2. You should not remove G! after the first or second application. You apply 3 coats of G1 fifteen minutes apart. All 3 coats should be removed at the same time. IMO you applied G1 incorrectly.
 
Ok, well in the video I said I was removing after the second coat. I know I wrote that I removed after 1st and 2nd. It has been almost a year since I applied this so I was going off the video. I do know that I read the instructions very thoroughly and followed them the best I could. I am not sure if I did all 3 but if it says to, I may have. If the instructions say to not wipe off between coats, then I didn't. Sorry for the mistake, but like I said, it's been almost a year so I forgot how the applications was supposed to be. I will be getting a new windshield because of another rock that cracked the window. I could do the test all over again.





Sent from iPhone
 
MobileJay said:
Ok, well in the video I said I was removing after the second coat. I know I wrote that I removed after 1st and 2nd. It has been almost a year since I applied this so I was going off the video. I do know that I read the instructions very thoroughly and followed them the best I could. I am not sure if I did all 3 but if it says to, I may have. If the instructions say to not wipe off between coats, then I didn't. Sorry for the mistake, but like I said, it's been almost a year so I forgot how the applications was supposed to be. I will be getting a new windshield because of another rock that cracked the window. I could do the test all over again.





Sent from iPhone



Please do, as I have tried G1, G5, Aqua Pel, Rain X, Diamondlite and G1 seems to last and work the best.
 
Sure thing. I will write everything down so that I have record of what exactly was done. I will try to post videos once a month. This will take place after I get a new windshield installed. Could be a little bit before I do so. But I will post again.





Sent from iPhone
 
I tried G1, using the proper steps and I have to say a coat of rain-X beats it. G1 does not seem to make the water fly off the glass, it does bead amazing though when water droplets hit the windshield.
 
I find it quite interesting that people will go to a "marketed/promoted/boutique" product with out doing some research.

By that I mean to direct those to this simple fact, no matter who is "marketing" AquaPel at this time.

AquaPel was developed and formulated by one of the largest vehicle glass companies in the world.

That is PPG.

Now, consider this, producing automotive glass,(a leader world wide) as well as other glass products, should know a lot more than some small "boutique" chemical company when dealing with "glass", or am I wrong?

PPG is not good at marketing to a "small-in their eyes" market such as a mass consumer market.

They did try, they even did a marketing deal with STP a few years back, but the "elegance" of the product went right over the heads of the mass market.

Millions were spent on TV, print ads, etc, however, PPG were not equiped to work in that marketing world, and the market was more responsive to the mass marketing of the folks who had previously spent millions to market a "silicone resin" product, most are farmilar with, "Rain-X".

The product Aqua-Pel, was then licensed to a company that knew something about taking advantage of the millions spent by other companies, to educate the public on the advantages of such products.

And then it happened, all the little "boutique" companies have attempted to reverse engineer the PPG product, and some do get close.

I have a long time ( a decade or so ) of background with the PPG, Aqua-Pel products. ( the company I retired from had a deal for private label of the Aqua-Pel product, they market it as Valu-Vision, same product.)

Until as such time comes to pass, the patent runs out on the PPG product, I feel sure there is nothing out there that can match it.

Just a hint, it comes in a "glass tube" that must be broken to release the aerobic required resin of the product, which is why one see's a small flash of "smoke" when it is done. An aerobic cure is when "air" is required to catalize the polymer resins that create the barrier, etc of the coating.

Air you breath creates the chemical reaction which cures and bonds the resin that is what makes it last for as long as it does, etc.

Which is why the product must be applied in the allowed time, and no saving what you don't use.

Just some "inside" information that may be considered.

Brand names are one thing, but true, chemically and formulated, by a leader in the glass industry to produce and market a product, wins out with me everytime.

Grumpy
 
Ron Ketcham said:
I Until as such time comes to pass, the patent runs out on the PPG product, I feel sure there is nothing out there that can match it.



I'd be willing to bet that Opti-Guard can and will give it a run for its money. And I'm not all that sure that the technology isn't all that similar. Especially seeing that it can also be used on more then just glass. Just throwing it out there....





btw...Nice review & videos Jay!
 
Nice review jay.





Thanks for the info Ron. I have not used Aquapel yet but am planning on it.







Also I have heard that there are a few other nano coatings coming to market for glass application and protection as well.
 
I was told that OC and OG should not be used on the windshieldbc it get abraided by the wipers and road film.



David Fermani said:
I'd be willing to bet that Opti-Guard can and will give it a run for its money. And I'm not all that sure that the technology isn't all that similar. Especially seeing that it can also be used on more then just glass. Just throwing it out there....





btw...Nice review & videos Jay!
 
JSFM35X said:
I was told that OC and OG should not be used on the windshieldbc it get abraided by the wipers and road film.



Optimum warns against using their coating on any glass panels due to liabilty reasons. All products will get abraded as you use your wipers.
 
David Fermani said:
Optimum warns against using their coating on any glass panels due to liabilty reasons. All products will get abraded as you use your wipers.





I agree with David on this one.





I used OG on my truck and did all of the side and back windows with the OG as well. It works great and there is no haze or vision problems that I can tell. Because of this I am considering applying it to the front as well. But as of yet have not. I am waiting on a new nano glass sealant to come out that may be even better than OG or Aquapel.

 
Back
Top