Ron Ketcham
Active member
I don't attempt to fix, work on, etc any of my vehicles without a good "mechanical/electrical/suspension, etc, manual" before I start the repair.
Recently I aquired a Haynes manual for one of my vehicles.
Then, after reading through it, bought a Chilton for the same vehicle.
I was amazed at the differences between the two, from the paper and print, to the size of the print, the use of blurry photos vs line drawings that showed how a part or such were put together, the electical diagrams, etc.
So, before one spends the $26 to $30 for a manual, compare them, which one meets your expectations, which do you find to provide a higher comfort level should you use them?
I took the two manuals to to friends, who are quite good at mechanical work and are very good at repairing the "unknown to most" parts of a vehicle.
I asked them to chose two subjects in each manual, and to spend 5 minutes reading of each manual's section of their choice of the subject.
Then they were asked, "which manual did you, as one who has the more than basic knowledge of the subject you chose, did you feel was most helpful to those who don't have your knowledge?".
Both chose the Chilton over the Haynes, hands down.
So there you are, if you are in need of a manual for repairing your vehicle, pick the Chilton over the Haynes.
I am not saying that the Haynes is not producing good manuals, only that due to what I have worked with and two experienced professionals, the Chilton may be a better choice.
Grumpy
Recently I aquired a Haynes manual for one of my vehicles.
Then, after reading through it, bought a Chilton for the same vehicle.
I was amazed at the differences between the two, from the paper and print, to the size of the print, the use of blurry photos vs line drawings that showed how a part or such were put together, the electical diagrams, etc.
So, before one spends the $26 to $30 for a manual, compare them, which one meets your expectations, which do you find to provide a higher comfort level should you use them?
I took the two manuals to to friends, who are quite good at mechanical work and are very good at repairing the "unknown to most" parts of a vehicle.
I asked them to chose two subjects in each manual, and to spend 5 minutes reading of each manual's section of their choice of the subject.
Then they were asked, "which manual did you, as one who has the more than basic knowledge of the subject you chose, did you feel was most helpful to those who don't have your knowledge?".
Both chose the Chilton over the Haynes, hands down.
So there you are, if you are in need of a manual for repairing your vehicle, pick the Chilton over the Haynes.
I am not saying that the Haynes is not producing good manuals, only that due to what I have worked with and two experienced professionals, the Chilton may be a better choice.
Grumpy