PB SSR 2.5 or Meg's 82 or 83

I

imported_dirtdiggler

New member
Hello All,



I have a 2k Camry in burgandy. I bought this car used with dealer installed rotary swirls and left over wax everywhere.

I have used orange pad with PB 2.5 to remove most of the swirls, then used PB EX with carnuba, then topped of with Collonite and Klasse, but i still see swirls. I worked each 2x2 section as suggested. I am thinking that the PB SSR 2.5 is not enough to polish the finish.

I plan on either trying Meguiars 82 or 83. Which one would be more beneficial to remove the swirls and which is more of the aggressive than PB 2.5 or should I try the PB SSR 2.5 again ?



Thank you
 
I found the SSR line easier to use then DACP (#83). But if I had other options open I would go with Optimum Compound over both.
 
I would use #83 just because I have never tried and PB's

note that stepping down from #83 is not #82 its #80. #82 does an good job on the light swirls and then fills the rest of the swirls
 
dirtdiggler said:
Hello All,



I have a 2k Camry in burgandy. I bought this car used with dealer installed rotary swirls and left over wax everywhere.

I have used orange pad with PB 2.5 to remove most of the swirls, then used PB EX with carnuba, then topped of with Collonite and Klasse, but i still see swirls. I worked each 2x2 section as suggested. I am thinking that the PB SSR 2.5 is not enough to polish the finish.

I plan on either trying Meguiars 82 or 83. Which one would be more beneficial to remove the swirls and which is more of the aggressive than PB 2.5 or should I try the PB SSR 2.5 again ?



Thank you
Click to expand...



Out of curiosity...why are you topping collinite with Klasse? Klasse is either a polish or sealant...neither go over carnuba
 
#83 is more aggressive than SSR2.5. Its harder to use but removes more defects IMO.



#80 is less aggressive than SSR2.5, and #82 is below that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top