Don't worry, I don't take disagreement with my views as picking a fight.

I'm happy for anyone to express their knowledge and experiences freely. That's what Autopia is all about, as is MOL, which I also visit regularly.
I should've been more clear in my post. Let me see if I can clarify. When I said ScratchX combines DC 1&2, I didn't mean it achieved exactly the same results in the same way. ScratchX is far more aggressive than DC 1, as you stated.
What I meant is that since DC 1 is a cleaner and DC 2 is a glaze, ScratchX is likewise a cleaner (a very abrasive one) and a glaze in one.
I was simply responding to your first suggestion to preceed ScratchX with DC 1, with my suggestion that since both are cleaners it would be a duplication of the cleaning step - especially since you'll be following a mild cleaner (DC 1) with an aggressive cleaner (ScratchX).
It was also a response to your second suggestion to follow ScratchX with a glaze, with my suggestion that ScratchX is rich in polishing oils and fillers (a glaze) and to use a glaze is, again, a duplication of the task.
You were right in saying that "DC#1 and #2 definitely do not do the work of Scratch-X". ScratchX does more IMHO.
In essence, I wasn't saying your suggestion was
wrong, just a
duplication of the same tasks - which one can do if one feels it'll produce better results.
I apologize if I seemed contrary. :bigups