The jury is still out on the "hype" but its a much better improvement in cutting and polishing from its predecessors, the Optimum compound and polish.
The usual machinery, heated garage in T.O., sorry for the dark pics.. it gets dark here at like 4 'o clock.. (i hate winter)
So as per usual, I took out my steel wool, but this time, I really , really sawed away at my test panel. I gave it all kinds of hard passes. These are some very bad scratches/swirls.
I found Optimum Hyper took an overly long time to work in. More so than the compound and polish of the past. This may hinder a detailer if he/she has got 2 or more SUV's lined up and waiting for the day. One quick zip pass, blasting away a 1400 or 1500 won't work.
Test One: (Right side only) Rotary At 1400rpm with minimal product,(2 thin lines) the first pass was okay, but very fine swirls still persisted. The product but worked in faster.
Test Two: (Right side only) Rotary At 1400 rpm with more product, ( 2 thicker lines and dabs on the pad) slight improvement and worked in faster.
Test Three: (Right side only) Rotary At 1200 rpm with even more product ( 2 thicker lines , dabs on the pad 12, 3, 6, 9 clock position) I found this combo to be produce the best outcome. I thought there would be more sling, but there wasn't. But, man oh man did it take TIME to work in. I thought it would never end. Luckily i can change my hand position and trigger lock my rotary.
Final:
After VM and Meg's #21
I guess in trademark Optimum compound style, LONGER WORK IN TIME even with 1200rpm doing passes at about the 3 second per foot rule. (thanks sean)
I had no "holograming" which was nice even with Test One when i had minimal product on blasting away at 1400 rpm.
I'm used to 1400 with Meg's #83 DACP so this longer process will be a factor on how many cars i get done in one day. I would not recommend it for detailers who don't have time on their side. The surface was slick, and ready for pre sealant. I should have followed up with Optimum Polish as per Scottwax's recommendation, however instead I went the route of VM and then Meg's #21.
For my next test, (the left side of test panel) I'm going to do Hyper then Opt Polish and see the outcome.
I like the product and will use it when time allows me to, but for the most part I prefer using meg's #83 DACP. Slightly more cutting power and less time doing smr work.
Thanks for reading..
The usual machinery, heated garage in T.O., sorry for the dark pics.. it gets dark here at like 4 'o clock.. (i hate winter)

So as per usual, I took out my steel wool, but this time, I really , really sawed away at my test panel. I gave it all kinds of hard passes. These are some very bad scratches/swirls.


I found Optimum Hyper took an overly long time to work in. More so than the compound and polish of the past. This may hinder a detailer if he/she has got 2 or more SUV's lined up and waiting for the day. One quick zip pass, blasting away a 1400 or 1500 won't work.
Test One: (Right side only) Rotary At 1400rpm with minimal product,(2 thin lines) the first pass was okay, but very fine swirls still persisted. The product but worked in faster.

Test Two: (Right side only) Rotary At 1400 rpm with more product, ( 2 thicker lines and dabs on the pad) slight improvement and worked in faster.

Test Three: (Right side only) Rotary At 1200 rpm with even more product ( 2 thicker lines , dabs on the pad 12, 3, 6, 9 clock position) I found this combo to be produce the best outcome. I thought there would be more sling, but there wasn't. But, man oh man did it take TIME to work in. I thought it would never end. Luckily i can change my hand position and trigger lock my rotary.
Final:
After VM and Meg's #21

I guess in trademark Optimum compound style, LONGER WORK IN TIME even with 1200rpm doing passes at about the 3 second per foot rule. (thanks sean)
I had no "holograming" which was nice even with Test One when i had minimal product on blasting away at 1400 rpm.
I'm used to 1400 with Meg's #83 DACP so this longer process will be a factor on how many cars i get done in one day. I would not recommend it for detailers who don't have time on their side. The surface was slick, and ready for pre sealant. I should have followed up with Optimum Polish as per Scottwax's recommendation, however instead I went the route of VM and then Meg's #21.
For my next test, (the left side of test panel) I'm going to do Hyper then Opt Polish and see the outcome.
I like the product and will use it when time allows me to, but for the most part I prefer using meg's #83 DACP. Slightly more cutting power and less time doing smr work.
Thanks for reading..