SuperBee364
New member
Gotta order some more OC 2.0 today, so I thought I might as well throw in a bottle of polish since ADS has free shipping on orders over a hundred bucks.
I love M105, but I hate the dust. Bad.
Accumulator has mentioned that the new spray version of OHC produces very little dust, but doesn't have the chops of 105. That sounds great, but I kinda like the bite 105 has. Honestly, I prefer the original formula of 105 as it had quite a bit more bite than the new version.
How does Optimum Compound II compare to both OHC and 105 as far as cut? I've heard that OHC has a very long working time, and that you can just keep working the same application until you get the desired level of correction. Is that also the case with OCII? How does the dusting of OCII compare to 105?
Overall, is it possible to get the same great DA results with OHC or OCII as you can with 105, or are they more suited for rotary work?
Any general thoughts regarding these two compounds would be greatly appreciated.
TIA!
--Supe
I love M105, but I hate the dust. Bad.
Accumulator has mentioned that the new spray version of OHC produces very little dust, but doesn't have the chops of 105. That sounds great, but I kinda like the bite 105 has. Honestly, I prefer the original formula of 105 as it had quite a bit more bite than the new version.
How does Optimum Compound II compare to both OHC and 105 as far as cut? I've heard that OHC has a very long working time, and that you can just keep working the same application until you get the desired level of correction. Is that also the case with OCII? How does the dusting of OCII compare to 105?
Overall, is it possible to get the same great DA results with OHC or OCII as you can with 105, or are they more suited for rotary work?
Any general thoughts regarding these two compounds would be greatly appreciated.
TIA!
--Supe