Megs 205 is it similar to #80

[Labster]

Just curious what those who have used both say. I've been a fan of #80 for years now and I often use it as a spruce up detailing product because of how well it works. The one downside about 80 however is the amount of fillers that I've found it to have and the necessity for an IPA wipedown to ensure a defect free finish. Anyway, anyone have experience with #205?

 

[akimel]

Just curious what those who have used both say. I've been a fan of #80 for years now and I often use it as a spruce up detailing product because of how well it works. The one downside about 80 however is the amount of fillers that I've found it to have and the necessity for an IPA wipedown to ensure a defect free finish. Anyway, anyone have experience with #205?

Kave KG has just posted a review of M205 over at Detailing World. FYI.

 

[jordanrossbell]

The abrasives are different, 80s are diminishing..205 is micro..they have the same cut on the megs scale but im sure they are a bit different. (havent tried 205 though)