Is IronX worth it for the weekender?

V

VWGolfer

New member
I have seen nothing but rave reviews for IronX. So naturally I need it. However, I spot clay my car every few washes. So do you think it is worth carrying it as a hobbyist? Does clay leave behind iron deposits that might affect your sealant's bonding properties? If so, I would give it a try but if clay pulls all iron from the surface, then I don't see a need for my arsenal.

Maybe there is no clear answer but what do you think?

For the professional, I have no doubt it is a great product for those heavily decontaminated cars. But what about the weekender?
 
In my experience claying alone does not pull all of the contaminants. IronX removes bonded contaminants, especially in those cars who travel by rail or heavy industrial areas, now like with many products, is IronX needed? Not at all, it's great, I like it and use it. But as a hobbyist that likes trying new things then I recommend it. I don't know how it compares to other ferrous removers except Auto Finesse Iron Out and I found it dried much quicker than Iron X.
 
I'd say its still a good thing to have. Personally the way I see it, if you can remove contaminants from your vehicle without having to touch it, you're that much safer when it comes to keeping it free of defects.
 
I will tell you that an Iron removal product is necessary. Iron X is a good one. I recently picked up some Ferrex and will be doing a side by side comparison.

It makes claying suer easy and fast. I have started using an Iron removal product after the wash, then a nano skin pad on large clean areas, and clay the wheel wells and arches, as well as rocker panels and other tight or dirty areas.
 
JSFM35X, I'll stay tuned for the side by side.

Maybe the real question I want to ask is if clay cleans all contaminants or does it leave iron behind that would affect the bonding of a sealant? I understand it makes claying easier, but if claying is already easy on my own car, is there a reason to buy expensive IronX?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
VWGolfer said:
JSFM35X, I'll stay tuned for the side by side.

Maybe the real question I want to ask is if clay cleans all contaminants or does it leave iron behind that would affect the bonding of a sealant? I understand it makes claying easier, but if claying is already easy on my own car, is there a reason to buy expensive IronX?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Clay will only sheer off the metal contaminants whereas Iron X will chemically dissolve them. Claying will remove the non ferrous particulates. Complete decontamination requires both clay and Iron X or similar.
 
I recently started using Iron-X and will never be without it again. I cannot tell you (over the years) how long I've spent trying to clay the little brown dots off light-colored cars. Granted, most people will never know Iron-X even exists...or care...but you are different; you are a detailer. That's why your car is always cleaner than anyone elses.
 
Wonder if anybody's ever compared these with ValuGard's "B", which I'd consider the Industry Standard (tested and approved by all the major auto manufacturers).

And yeah, I absolutely believe that decontamination systems are appropriate for the casual/non-Pro/weekend detailer. I *do* think that, uhm....the more "casual and non-Pro" the user is the more important it can be to stick with stuff that's safe (for both the vehicle and the user).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top