violentveedub
New member
I've used the DG stuff for about a year now and I'm really impressed with the product but ever since the hype started to swirl about Meg's new QD I had to try it. I used to be a diehard Meg's fan and I figure the people that introduced me to the QD should get another try...
The first test, my 07 VW Rabbit. It was slightly dirty from a rain storm on my home and I used both QD's to clean a section of the hood.
Meg's:
Decent cleaning, decent shine, you just can't beat the spray pattern from the Meguire's bottle it mists perfect and covers nicely. The smell of this product is like everything else from Meg's lately (ala NXT) not bad by any means but if they are doing that to cut costs, why does this cost so much? Perhaps it just for "family" recognition. One thing that really bothered me about this product was that it didn't seem to shine the platic parts. I use 921 on my black plastics and it makes them nice and deep, with a clean shine.
DG:
Better cleaning, Better Shine. Next to Meg's this stuff is closer to an actual waterless wash, it knocked out dirt and a few bug smashes. The inital slickness of the DG is much better but they both evened out after a few hours. 921 seemed to enhance the look of the paint vs. the Megs that only seemed to clean it.
Test 2: A freshly washed car.
I washed my wifes jetta and then applied the Ultimate quick detailer. It did a great job of cleaning up some water spots and it left a generally clean look to the whole car. Once again 921 beat it in the looks department.
(I compared this to my bank of knowledge with my own car, both wear AW as the lsp)
Fresh applied pics:
My car...
The Wifes:
And then... It rained. Beading was, well kinda unimpressive considering the hype. I didn't see anything so great about it. It did seem to shed water well as I drove it but not for very long.
The final verdict:
*921* Two bucks cheaper, just as slick, better looking with more cleaning ability. Duragloss has another winner. It smells nicer too!
The Meg's stuff is good but not the best, if it was in 5 dollar price range it would be great but since it's pushing 10... I don't think so.
The first test, my 07 VW Rabbit. It was slightly dirty from a rain storm on my home and I used both QD's to clean a section of the hood.
Meg's:
Decent cleaning, decent shine, you just can't beat the spray pattern from the Meguire's bottle it mists perfect and covers nicely. The smell of this product is like everything else from Meg's lately (ala NXT) not bad by any means but if they are doing that to cut costs, why does this cost so much? Perhaps it just for "family" recognition. One thing that really bothered me about this product was that it didn't seem to shine the platic parts. I use 921 on my black plastics and it makes them nice and deep, with a clean shine.
DG:
Better cleaning, Better Shine. Next to Meg's this stuff is closer to an actual waterless wash, it knocked out dirt and a few bug smashes. The inital slickness of the DG is much better but they both evened out after a few hours. 921 seemed to enhance the look of the paint vs. the Megs that only seemed to clean it.
Test 2: A freshly washed car.
I washed my wifes jetta and then applied the Ultimate quick detailer. It did a great job of cleaning up some water spots and it left a generally clean look to the whole car. Once again 921 beat it in the looks department.
(I compared this to my bank of knowledge with my own car, both wear AW as the lsp)
Fresh applied pics:
My car...

The Wifes:


And then... It rained. Beading was, well kinda unimpressive considering the hype. I didn't see anything so great about it. It did seem to shed water well as I drove it but not for very long.


The final verdict:
*921* Two bucks cheaper, just as slick, better looking with more cleaning ability. Duragloss has another winner. It smells nicer too!
The Meg's stuff is good but not the best, if it was in 5 dollar price range it would be great but since it's pushing 10... I don't think so.