Bush or Kerry?

Who will you vote for in November?

  • Bush

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kerry

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Feh.



None of the above, in a perfect world. But, since the world ain't perfect, I'm going to have to vote for the lesser of two evils, and I haven't figured out which one that is yet. As a libertarian, I find either choice distasteful.



Tort
 
Bush....



Liberals/Democrats can be blamed for letting the country become what it is today, with all the illegal aliens running around, gay marriages, cutting defense spending (thanks you disgraceful tub of garbage Clinton)...
 
blackcaraddict said:
Bush....



Liberals/Democrats can be blamed for letting the country become what it is today, with all the illegal aliens running around, gay marriages, cutting defense spending (thanks you disgraceful tub of garbage Clinton)...



LOL!! That ought to jerk a few knees!!



I'm voting for Bush.
 
A bad day in the USA is still better than a good day in any other country.



I am just glad we all have freedom to be able to vote in any manner we choose and the right to speak our minds without fear of prosecution.
 
I knew this thread's day would come. Ruh roh!



The Bush sticker came off my bumper with the Medicare give-aways. Spending spiraled upward in an unbridled fashion. The disapproval continued with the passive-aggressive donations package they sent me (I've given in the past to the RNC). The illegal alien passivity fanned the flames even further.



-but-



Kerry's first wife was worth $300m. His current wife is worth $700m. With this public information, he has the gall to tell the hardest workers in the country that they must work until mid-April or June for the government *regardless* of the fact that people keeping their money always encourages the economy to grow (read: more jobs). To compound everything, he wishes to sit down with terrorists in the future to "deal." This worked in the Palestinian/Israeli talks, right?



My hesitant vote is with unburned buildings.
 
I'll vote for Bush even though I don't agree with everything he says or does. However I can't vote for Kerry who in the past has said our troops should serve at the UN's directive.
 
blackcaraddict said:
(thanks you disgraceful tub of garbage Clinton)...



Don't even get me started on the Clinton Gun Ban...



In anycase, I'll vote for Bush (but I really wish there was someone a little more conservative than he is).
 
ppl blame bush for the iraq war...it was somethin that needed to be done...clinton should have done it if he wasn't too busy showin lewinsky his cigar collection. Bush to stay i say
 
Thumper said:
I'll vote for Bush even though I don't agree with everything he says or does. However I can't vote for Kerry who in the past has said our troops should serve at the UN's directive.



Same here. I think Bush has been too much to the left on domestic issues (bloated farm bill, medicare, etc), but I still get about 2/3rds of what I want with Bush. Kerry gives me nothing I want.



2/3rds > 0
 
ill probably vote Bush. i dont agree with everything he has done, but when it comes between him and Kerry...Ill vote Bush every time.



Kerry cannot make up his mind on any issue, especially war. At least Bush is firm in his beliefs, not wishy washy.
 
blackcaraddict said:
Bush....



Liberals/Democrats can be blamed for letting the country become what it is today, with all the illegal aliens running around, gay marriages, cutting defense spending (thanks you disgraceful tub of garbage Clinton)...



With a remark like that, you sound as dumb as that pumpkin head Rush Limbaugh, and I consider myself more towards the Right (particularly on foriegn policy - hence my signature!).



I would liked to have seen a McCain / Lieberman ticket. Two of my "favorite" Senators. Put Sen. Richard Lugar (R) Indiana as Sec. of State and roll out former Sen. Sam Nunn (D) Georgia as Sec. of Defense.



Check this site out to see where you're politicians stand on particular issues. It's an informative site: http://www.issues2000.org/default.htm
 
Spilchy said:
With a remark like that, you sound as dumb as that pumpkin head Rush Limbaugh, and I consider myself more towards the Right (particularly on foriegn policy - hence my signature!).



Rush doesn't normally use such inflamatory language. Hannity does, but not Rush. I still like Sean though. I do agree that name calling isn't the best way to win an argument.



I would liked to have seen a McCain / Lieberman ticket. Two of my "favorite" Senators. Put Sen. Richard Lugar (R) Indiana as Sec. of State and roll out former Sen. Sam Nunn (D) Georgia as Sec. of Defense.



Both are honorable guys but too liberal for me.



Check this site out to see where you're politicians stand on particular issues. It's an informative site: http://www.issues2000.org/default.htm



I match up best with Bush. On another site, based on my answers, I am considered an Libertarian leaning Conservative. :up
 
remember libertarians. . . .yes, you may have a beef with Bush on some issues, but dont forget the supreme court appointments are coming up too.
 
Kanchou said:
remember libertarians. . . .yes, you may have a beef with Bush on some issues, but dont forget the supreme court appointments are coming up too.



Excellent point....one issue Conservatives should remember that too.
 
Bush stepped out of the limo and toured the ruin. He was dressed casually in a dun-colored windbreaker. The ground was still shifting and unstable, dangerous and fiery. No preparation had been made for Bush to speak. The plan had been for him to deliver remarks later in the day, at a meeting with families of the missing at the Javits Convention Center, uptown in the West Thirties. At ground zero, there was no microphone, no sound system. Bush had no notes. But the crowd of workers pressed in close upon him, seething with emotion, and Bush decided he had to speak. Somebody passed him a bullhorn. A retired firefighter, Bill Beckwith, climbed atop a wrecked fire truck and jumped up and down on it to check its strength. Bush climbed up beside him. He put an arm around Beckwith's shoulders to help him keep his balance-and then left it there. He began to speak, to tell the workers that the whole nation was praying for them and for the city of New York. But his mouth was too close to the mouthpiece and the sound garbled. A worker shouted, "We can't hear you!" So Bush pulled the bullhorn away from his face and replied with a characteristic Bush joke: "Well, I can hear you." Then his face grew serious. "I can hear you. The rest of the world hears you. And the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon." Was the crowd shouting before? It was roaring now. USA! USA! USA! - "The Right Man", by David Frum



http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...102-1087732-9718569?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/rescue.video.09.html#14th

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010914-9.v.html





"Can the first bombs be food?" - George W. Bush to senior advisors during the planning of the war in Afghanistan



While aid groups criticize U.S. food drops, Afghan refugees are welcoming the peanut butter that falls from the sky. "I was full for the first time in three years," says refugee Rajaballi (like many Afghans, he only goes by one name). He especially liked the small packets of salt and pepper, he adds. The political effects of the aid might not be as straightforward as U.S. planners would hope. For his part, Ahmed Khan has no worries about politics and he certainly isn't complaining otherwise. "It's very good," he says of the U.S. aid rations. "We eat it."



http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3067540/





Now another Republican President has needed to calm a grieving nation, and George W. Bush did well. His address at the Houston Memorial Service proved, once again, that his pre-election critics' claims of a "bumbling Bush" were hogwash. His choice of words and uplifting theme were so similar to Reagan's, I felt as if I were taken back 17 years to Peggy Noonan's classic "Challenger Speech." And at the service, the President showed the kind side we all knew he had (so similar to that of his father) when he offered Commander Rick Husband's son a handkerchief. The boy will forever have that memory to cherish-a thoughtful, considerate President of the United States, who cared enough to console him at his daddy's memorial service. President Reagan was known as a "great communicator", and his training in acting no doubt was an asset. But he was honest, as well, in his delivery, and he spoke only what he believed. The same goes for President Bush. Though his training was in business and not on stage, during his Presidency, Mr. Bush has been able to communicate honestly, convincingly, and compassionately. Can you imagine how sincere Al Gore would have seemed delivering the Columbia Memorial Address, or worse yet, Bill Clinton?



http://www.bushcountry.org/news/col...03_guenthner-president-bush-ronald-reagan.htm





US marines took Safwan at about 8am yesterday. Ajami Saadoun Khlis, whose son and brother were executed under the Saddam regime, sobbed like a child on the shoulder of the Guardian's Egyptian translator. He mopped the tears but they kept coming. "You just arrived," he said. "You're late. What took you so long? God help you become victorious. I want to say hello to Bush, to shake his hand. We came out of the grave."



http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,919642,00.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top