jaybs02
New member
I was looking through some older threads and it seems that maybe our mindset has changed.
Just a few years ago if someone had mentioned that there were fillers in a product it raised a commotion. People asking how do you know whether you corrected the problem or were merely covering it up where it will return after a few washings. So people were going the extra step and doing IPA wipe downs between steps to ensure that the defects were being removed and not merely masked.
Now it seems as though we are embracing the concept of fillers in products. This is evident by the introduction of a number of different glazes that have been introduced from a few different manufacturers. I think the key thing is that now they can be used under a sealant where the oils in the earlier ones caused bonding issues.
Now we don't have to get the paint surface perfect but close enough and we let the fillers do the rest.
So my questions is have we lowered our standards or are we just taking advantage of new technology.
What are peoples thoughts on this?
Just a few years ago if someone had mentioned that there were fillers in a product it raised a commotion. People asking how do you know whether you corrected the problem or were merely covering it up where it will return after a few washings. So people were going the extra step and doing IPA wipe downs between steps to ensure that the defects were being removed and not merely masked.
Now it seems as though we are embracing the concept of fillers in products. This is evident by the introduction of a number of different glazes that have been introduced from a few different manufacturers. I think the key thing is that now they can be used under a sealant where the oils in the earlier ones caused bonding issues.
Now we don't have to get the paint surface perfect but close enough and we let the fillers do the rest.
So my questions is have we lowered our standards or are we just taking advantage of new technology.
What are peoples thoughts on this?