Any home theater buffs?

TGates

Active member
I'm looking for a recommendation on equipment. I'm not actually a home theater fan, per se, because I listen to 95% 2 channel audio (music.) I am going to be picking up a set of Klipsch RF-7 speakers (I love Klipsch sound) to replace my cheap Infinity Studio Monitors but am a little concerned that my 110 watt x 5 RMS Yamaha receiver won't pack enough punch to really accentuate what these speakers can do. They're pretty serious speakers from what I understand, but they are a little bit power hungry, although they are quite efficient for how large they are. Seems a popular way to go is with a tube amp... but, I haven't won the lottery yet.



I don't have much (okay, any) experience with using separate components (pre-amp, amp, receiver, etc.), as in the past, I have always just used my receiver to plug everything into, and been content with that. My receiver now does have a pre-amp output, so I am considering simply adding a pre-amp to it. However, I have no idea how this works or what to expect. Also, the prices I'm seeing for these are ridiculous. I'm talking over $1000 for a pre-amp. I don't need anything that fancy. Really all I want is something to boost my power (Klipsch recommends 200watts per speaker).



I was hoping somebody here could make a recommendation for a pre-amp that won't break the bank, but will allow me to get the extra 90 watts I need. Does ONLY the pre-amp supply wattage, or is it a combination of the pre-amp and the receiver? So, since my receiver is 110 watts, would I need a 90 watt pre-amp, or do I need a pre-amp with the full 200 watts? :think:



Wow, that was a lot for a car detailing forum. What can I say? I like the attitudes and knowledge around here. Why not throw this out there?



When I'm finished, I would like to be running my RF-7 mains, two surrounds, a center, and my SVS subwoofer. Thanks for any help, advice, anything ya got.
 
To tell you the truth your current reciever will handle the 5 speakers you have. The sub will have to be amplified though. The only thing a pre-amp does is 2 channel (tone, source selection, balance). A processor which are in 5+ channel recievers does the same (dsp selection, source selection etc). All Klipsch speakers are very efficient. I use to have a Yamaha receiver and Klipsch speakers, to me when listening to music was way to bright, but for movies wes very nice. If you have anymore questions let me know.
 
John Styrnol said:
To tell you the truth your current reciever will handle the 5 speakers you have. The sub will have to be amplified though. The only thing a pre-amp does is 2 channel (tone, source selection, balance). A processor which are in 5+ channel recievers does the same (dsp selection, source selection etc). All Klipsch speakers are very efficient. I use to have a Yamaha receiver and Klipsch speakers, to me when listening to music was way to bright, but for movies wes very nice. If you have anymore questions let me know.



Thanks for the reply. I was thinking about maybe also getting a newer receiver, as I see some that have 170 watts per channel. I'm not sure how much of an improvement I'll get with 60 additional watts per channel over what I have now. My subwoofer is powered, so it just needs to be plugged into the receiver and it's good to go. Unforunately, it doesn't have a frequency level knob, so it doesn't pick up even some kick drum (bass drum) on certain recordings. I know I go against the grain when I say I like to feel and hear the bass in my music. Seems most aficionados think of bass as an afterthought, looking more for a well-rounded sound, which is also important, but I do like the bass to be highlighted. Probably because I play the bass guitar myself. So, needless to say, I'm hoping the RF-7s with the twin 10 inch woofers in each enclosure will pump out some good bass.



In my case, I'm not really worried about the surround/center channels, because like I said, I listen to 2 channel music the vast majority of the time, but I do need the other channels to be there for DVDs, SACDs, etc.
 
I would first see what the Yamaha can do before you spend any money.



Second, when you connect another amp, you are bypassing the receiver's own amp.



If you need one, I'd suggest Parasound. Go to www.audiogon.com for high end stuff at a steal.



BTW, you need a power amp (amp) not a preamp. The receiver is your preamp.



The woofers in the speaker isn't really going to deliver the sub bass you are after. You will need a dedicated subwoofer. www.hsuresearch.com
 
I have a Yamaha RX-V995 that's part of my 3 year old HT setup with a Pioneer SD-643HD5 64" HDTV.



The previous repsonse is correct in that if you have a Receiver/Amplifier then you don't need to pre-amp unless



a) you want to (pureist prefer it) and your Receiver/Amp has pre-out's or Main/out's



and or



b) you don't have a receiver/amp just a reciever.



I chose Paradigm's for my speakers (Reference Studio 60's for the mains) and the Yamaha with's it's 100W per channel does me some justice.



here are some links you can do some research at



Audio Review

AVS Forums

Home Theater Forums



Hope this helps
 
well imagine that, I didn't know we autopians were such a diverse group. I love that spot. I bounce from hobby to hobby which means from forums to forums.



AVS is like here. Alot of people helping each other out with out the hassle and putting people down cuz they know less than you
 
Hey thanks for the replies guys. I have browsed the Audio Review website and various forums and man, that stuff is overwhelming to me.



Regarding the pre-amp, the only reason I even brought it up was because when I e-mailed Klipsch about recommendations to power the RF-7s, he said he recommends 200watts and that if my receiver had a pre-amp output, the best thing to do would be to add a pre-amp. He also said the 110 watts I have now will drive them just fine, but maybe not to super high volume levels (which doesn't really matter to me.)





tdekany-- I already have a dedicated subwoofer. I have the SVS PB10-ISD. Problem is, without a frequency knob, I can't really adjust it to pick up much of the bass frequencies encountered in most music reproductions. Maybe I'll step up to the 12 to get that, after I get the Klipsch's.
 
Klipsch has always been known as a premier maker of highly sensitive speakers. That is, speakers that take less power to play louder than others. Paul Klipsch always felt that what the world needed was a really good 5W amp.



The RF-7s' rated sensitivity is 102db @2.83V/1m. That translates as playing freaking loud with only 1 Watt of drive. With your present 110W amp you'll be able to make ears bleed in the next county.





PC.
 
I am a member on Home Theater Forum and definitely agree with Yamaha as far as receivers go. Other brands you may want to consider:



Denon

Marantz

Onkyo

Outlaw

NAD



Speakers I would recommend:



Velodyne

Energy

Paradigm

B&W

Polk Audio (RT series)



However, a lot of people neglect to mention the cabling even though it is pretty critical as well.
 
Morbid: It's all good. :D



My dream setup consists of the following:



Yamaha RX-Z9 Receiver

B&W DM 600 S3 Speakers (Mains)

B&W LCR 600 S3 Center Channel Speaker

3 B&W LM-1 Bookshelf Speakers ( Surrounds)

Denon DVD-2910 DVD Player

Velodyne DD1012 Subwoofer

Cabling: Tributaries
 
PrinzII said:
Morbid: It's all good. :D



My dream setup consists of the following:



Yamaha RX-Z9 Receiver

B&W DM 600 S3 Speakers (Mains)

B&W LCR 600 S3 Center Channel Speaker

3 B&W LM-1 Bookshelf Speakers ( Surrounds)

Denon DVD-2910 DVD Player

Velodyne DD1012 Subwoofer

Cabling: Tributaries





I was looking into the RX-Z9 when it was all the buzz over at AVS. I do use Tributaries cabling too, it's the preferred cable at the local AV shop.



I'm currently running



Yamaha Rx-V995 Reciever

Pioneer Elite DV-47A - DVD Player

Pioneer CT-07D - Dual Cassette Tape Deck

Paradigm Reference Studio 60's (main's)

Paradigm Reference CC 450 (Center)

Paradigm Reference ADP 170's (Surrounds - rear)

Harmon Kardon 5 CD Player (forget the model #)



I don't have a big enough living room to go with a 7.1 setup so I don't see the need to upgrade my reciever.



Actually expect for not having HDI on my Projection TV I'm pretty set. I even was in on the HTPC threads when they started over at AVS and built a pretty darn good one using the guides there.
 
MorBid said:
I was looking into the RX-Z9 when it was all the buzz over at AVS. I do use Tributaries cabling too, it's the preferred cable at the local AV shop.



I'm currently running



Yamaha Rx-V995 Reciever

Pioneer Elite DV-47A - DVD Player

Pioneer CT-07D - Dual Cassette Tape Deck

Paradigm Reference Studio 60's (main's)

Paradigm Reference CC 450 (Center)

Paradigm Reference ADP 170's (Surrounds - rear)

Harmon Kardon 5 CD Player (forget the model #)



I don't have a big enough living room to go with a 7.1 setup so I don't see the need to upgrade my reciever.



Actually expect for not having HDI on my Projection TV I'm pretty set. I even was in on the HTPC threads when they started over at AVS and built a pretty darn good one using the guides there.



Nice! I love Paradigm speakers :D. Looking at getting the Studio 100's for my new house. I thought they sounded better than speakers sold for twice the price! Supposed to have one of the most advanced R&D facilities in North America.





:ca :ca
 
And just to be more specific on a few points:



BlackSunshine said:
… They're pretty serious speakers from what I understand, but they are a little bit power hungry, although they are quite efficient for how large they are. …
Two things here.



First, “power hungry� and “quite efficient� are exact opposites. At 102db @ 2.83V/1m they are extremely efficient and not in any way, shape, or form power hungry. They can withstand a lot of power but do not need a lot of power.



Also, “efficient for how large they are� is a common misconception. People look at large speakers and assume, as with large and small cars, they will need more power than small ones. Again, the exact opposite is true. The characteristics of a speaker that lead to higher efficiency, powerful magnet structures, high winding voice coils, large radiating surfaces, etc tend to make them larger. It’s small speaker that tend to be less efficient.



BlackSunshine said:
… Seems a popular way to go is with a tube amp …
That’s because tubes amps can sound very sweet and very musical but are almost always much less powerful than solid state amps and so they mate well with speakers that are more sensitive.



Note: the word efficient is often used in casual conversation but engineers prefer to use the term sensitive. Efficiency has a very specific scientific meaning that is cumbersome for engineers to use in calculations for real world loudspeakers and impossible for the consumers to relate to. So sensitivity, which means “how much loud you get for a given standardized electrical input� is used instead.



BlackSunshine said:
… My receiver now does have a pre-amp output, so I am considering simply adding a pre-amp to it. However, I have no idea how this works or what to expect. …
OK, terminology clarification in order:



Analog signals in music systems can be broken into three general catagories;



“low level�, the sort that come from microphones, phonograph cartridges, magnetic tape heads and, I suppose you could also include laser pickup detectors.



“line level�, which is how “electronic boxes� talk to each other, CD players, tape decks, phono preamplifiers, mixers, TVs, cable boxes, etc. In today’s digital world DACs (digital to analog converters), signal processors (like surround sound decoders) and such are handled at the line levels.



and “power�, which are signals that have enough “oomph� to drive speakers.



With separate components a pre-amp (used to sometimes be called “control amp�) accepts, switches, selects and massages all the line level stuff (and may have some low level like a phono section too) and feeds that to the power amps which then kick it up to power levels to drive speakers.



A receiver combines the line level pre-amp functions and power amps into one box. A receiver with “pre-amp outs� allows you to break the two functions apart and use either the pre-amp to drive external power amps or to drive the power amps with an external pre-amp.



It is common to take a receiver that has all the signal processing you want but wimpy power amps and use it to feed beefier power amplifiers. This is what was suggested to you.



BlackSunshine said:
… I was hoping somebody here could make a recommendation for a pre-amp that won't break the bank, but will allow me to get the extra 90 watts I need. …
It’s really unlikely you would need the extra power but you may be benefit from it under some circumstances.



BlackSunshine said:
… Does ONLY the pre-amp supply wattage, or is it a combination of the pre-amp and the receiver? …
Only power amps (or the power amp sections of the receiver) supply wattage to speakers.



BlackSunshine said:
… So, since my receiver is 110 watts, would I need a 90 watt pre-amp, or do I need a pre-amp with the full 200 watts? …
You can’t just add watts to your existing amps. You literally bypass them entirely and they do nothing. You would have to get external amplifiers rated at 200 Watts if that’s what you want.



BlackSunshine said:
… When I'm finished, I would like to be running my RF-7 mains, two surrounds, a center, and my SVS subwoofer. Thanks for any help, advice, anything ya got. …
As I said before, your current system should drive the RF-7s louder than you are ever likely to need or want (unless you have an absurdly large listening room, bigger than most people’s houses).



I would skip any more amps and save the money for the matching RC-7 center channel. Center channel speakers should always be matched to the other fronts. In fact, the most extreme HT types insist on using three identical speakers. Matching surrounds are desirable as well but not absolutely necessary on most program material. Movies especially, are usually mixed for ambience material in the surrounds rather than continuation of foreground material.



BlackSunshine said:
… My subwoofer is powered, so it just needs to be plugged into the receiver and it's good to go. Unforunately, it doesn't have a frequency level knob, so it doesn't pick up even some kick drum (bass drum) on certain recordings…
Frequency knobs don’t “turn up base�. That’s why they don’t exist on high quality woofer like yours. They change the “balance� of the sound and rarely for the better. Yours does have a level or "gain" control that’s meant to match it to the rest of the system (but can be used to accentuate or reduce overall bass). Powered woofers will often have crossover controls that change their high frequency rolloff and allow to “blend� the woofer with different speakers.



BlackSunshine said:
… I play the bass guitar myself …
Which menas you’re more in tune with low frequency content. That’s a blessing because low bass is the foundation of much music and curse because reproducing it accurately is very difficult and usually very expensive.



BlackSunshine said:
… I'm hoping the RF-7s with the twin 10 inch woofers in each enclosure will pump out some good bass. …
They should play fairly low and very loud. You may find that they outperform your woofer. Although the woofer is tuned to produce lower frequencies it still has much less radiating area than the woofers in the RF-7s. At some output level it will run out of excursion capability and won’t be able to keep up with the music. If the woofers in the RF-7s are still operating in their useable excursion range they’ll put out more sound, deeper.



BlackSunshine said:
… Regarding the pre-amp, the only reason I even brought it up was because when I e-mailed Klipsch about recommendations to power the RF-7s, he said he recommends 200watts …
As I said before, you may benefit occasionally (more likely, rarely if ever) from the extra power but it's unlikely you'll need it, or conversely, ever notice it’s missing, in a normal residential listening environment.



Try them for a while with your receiver. You can always upgrade later.



PC.
 
Wow, thank you very much for your reply. I have been looking for answers like that for a long time and have come up short. That really helped me out, and as you can tell, I'm a novice at this higher-end spectrum of A/V equipment. I will certainly take what you said into consideration, and the more I research the RF-7s, the more I see that I will probably be just fine with my current receiver.
 
Something to consider, have two separate systems one for Home Theater and one for 2 Channel audio. This was one of the best investments I made, very happy now. I'm more of a 2-channel/music person than HT.
 
John Styrnol said:
Something to consider, have two separate systems one for Home Theater and one for 2 Channel audio. This was one of the best investments I made, very happy now. I'm more of a 2-channel/music person than HT.



Indeed. I find you can "get away" with a lot more in a HT setup. I should stop reading this thread before I buy another sub. :doh
 
John Styrnol said:
Something to consider, have two separate systems one for Home Theater and one for 2 Channel audio. This was one of the best investments I made, very happy now. I'm more of a 2-channel/music person than HT.



I have considered this, but I don't really have the room for two systems in a two bedroom townhome. My bedroom is quite small. I would be happy with a Klipsch sub/sat system or one of the HT setups they offer for the occasional movie. I guess I could hook up the main's I'm getting for music duty to the "B" speaker output on my receiver and just set everything up in the living room.
 
Back
Top