I have been running into a constant problem lately. I have been offering my services to people, and by all means they are impressed with my previous work, and my recommendations from other clients are downright stellar. However, these same clients are also noticing work by other people. In order for understanding, I will now explain my process, and the process of my main competition (exterior alone).
Me:
1. Wash
2. Clay (if necessary)
3. Wash
4. Polish/Compound as necessary (SSRs)
5. Sealant (EX)
6. QD
Opposition:
1. Wash
2. Clay only if surface is in dire need (To quote him, "Im only going to do it if your car feels so bad that I can't bear to touch it.")
3. Wax (P21S)
Now my problem lies in explaining the differences between my work and this man's. My method for telling if a car needs clay work is to run a clay bar down the panel nearest the brakes and the hood. Usually if I get signigant contamination in these areas, I do the whole car (though I have been known to do the whole car regardless because ive allready got the bar and lube out and in my hands).
When I explain to my customers that I spend a signifigant ammount of time going over the panels, examining them under different lighting perspectives and attending to each panel's needs with the proper products...they are impressed. However, the kicker is in the following. My competition's work ends up looking like mine. Anyone that has used P21S knows that it will hide inperfections in the paint, and this is the method that my competition uses. When I inform my clients that his work will cover up those mistakes in the paint, thats all it does, it covers them up for a short ammount of time. Once the wax breaks down and wears away, the inperfections in the paint are still there. Instead of doing that, I spend the time necessary to remove those inperfections from the paint.
My average response from clients is similar to this: "Well its nice to know that you are able to do that, but the car is just going to look bad again once it gets dirty. So why should I pay more to have you do all of that extra stuff that I don't need, when he can make it look just as good for less?"
I really am stumped. My prices are reasnoble ($150 for an average car that is not downright filthy, more for a Van, SUV, or truck) and my work has never received even one complaint.
For reference, I give a picture of my own work:
Competition:
Now in all fairness he is a good guy, and I respect him quite a bit. It just irritates me that I am unable to give a good case for why someone should want their paint properly taken care of, rather than just having the problems masked.
Me:
1. Wash
2. Clay (if necessary)
3. Wash
4. Polish/Compound as necessary (SSRs)
5. Sealant (EX)
6. QD
Opposition:
1. Wash
2. Clay only if surface is in dire need (To quote him, "Im only going to do it if your car feels so bad that I can't bear to touch it.")
3. Wax (P21S)
Now my problem lies in explaining the differences between my work and this man's. My method for telling if a car needs clay work is to run a clay bar down the panel nearest the brakes and the hood. Usually if I get signigant contamination in these areas, I do the whole car (though I have been known to do the whole car regardless because ive allready got the bar and lube out and in my hands).
When I explain to my customers that I spend a signifigant ammount of time going over the panels, examining them under different lighting perspectives and attending to each panel's needs with the proper products...they are impressed. However, the kicker is in the following. My competition's work ends up looking like mine. Anyone that has used P21S knows that it will hide inperfections in the paint, and this is the method that my competition uses. When I inform my clients that his work will cover up those mistakes in the paint, thats all it does, it covers them up for a short ammount of time. Once the wax breaks down and wears away, the inperfections in the paint are still there. Instead of doing that, I spend the time necessary to remove those inperfections from the paint.
My average response from clients is similar to this: "Well its nice to know that you are able to do that, but the car is just going to look bad again once it gets dirty. So why should I pay more to have you do all of that extra stuff that I don't need, when he can make it look just as good for less?"
I really am stumped. My prices are reasnoble ($150 for an average car that is not downright filthy, more for a Van, SUV, or truck) and my work has never received even one complaint.
For reference, I give a picture of my own work:
Competition:

Now in all fairness he is a good guy, and I respect him quite a bit. It just irritates me that I am unable to give a good case for why someone should want their paint properly taken care of, rather than just having the problems masked.