Greg Nichols
New member
You have just polished a turd into a work of art.........Outstanding
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
RickRack said:pampos- Thanks!
CleanGSR- Thanks, I agree. It is new to the owner, so it will be taken care of from now on
Josh- Most Acuras I have worked on in the past have had really soft paint, but for some reason this wasn't the case on this one. I'd say it was somewhere in the middle.
It took me about 18 hours total to detail the exterior. I ran out of time to get to the interior.
Most of the panels did not show any loss in paint thickness, besides a small area on one of the panels that required a wool pad to remove some more serious defects. This particular area was reading 5.2 mils before any polishing and read 5.1 mils after, so a total of .1 mil was removed. The paint meter does vary slightly, so it is impossible to measure exactly how much was removed. I use it more as a guide than anything, so I always use extreme caution when doing heavy correction work.
RickRack said:Macruz19- Do you happen to have a paint thickness gauge? I was wondering what kind of readings your car gets since it's the same car. I did a little searching and it looks like Acuras are famous for having thin paint. This explains why it was loaded with rock chips everywhere.
mattgg11 said:I've got one question I can't seem to figure out. You state...
"The paint thickness was measured on every body panel using a paint thickness gauge to ensure that a significant amount of clear was present before any aggressive polishing was performed."
I assume that a paint thickness gauge measures the total amount of "paint" on a body panel, which would include primer, color, and clear coats.
So if you get a reading of 5.1 mills, how do you know how much of that is clear coat? The primer and color coats could be 5 mills thick and the clear coat only 0.1 mills thick.
Explain how you "ensure a significant amount of CLEAR is present" with a PTG.
CleanGSR said:Amazing turnaround. I can't believe someone would let such a nice car get into such horrible shape.
Jeff_M said:Before my name starts to get sullied around these parts, I thought I'd chime in. I bought this car back in December of last year. The outdoor conditions when I looked at the car were cloudy, and it was freshly washed, but I could tell it needed a good detail. To be honest, your average person would say that it looked good (which mean horrible amongst Autopians!). If I had been able to see all of the flaws, whether under full sun or fluorescents, I still got a great deal on it, and probably would have made the same decision.
Rick did an AWESOME job on the car (you all know that he always does). Unfortunately, the paint contamination he had mentioned actually masked a good part of the rock chips. Now that the paint has been restored, the chips are much more apparent. Go on the Acura forums and there are constant complaints about how easily the TL paint chips. Not surprisingly, this coincides with the reading Rick obtained with his paint meter.
This post, on Acurazine, basically does a great job summarizing the problems with the Acura TL factory paint:
Acura TL Community - Paint Issues?
Unfortunately, a significant amount of dust (or pollen) settled on the car, which I picked up from Rick at night. As good as it looked the next day, I am dying to wash it and see how it really looks!
PS - Again, I am not the owner that mistreated this beautiful car. For a better perspective, check out this thread with pictures of the detail on my last automobile:
http://autopia.org/forum/click-brag/57051-1998-4runner-first-detail-pc-sorry-about-lack-sun.html?highlight=4runner